Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annoyed (film)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:56, 18 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Annoyed (film)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I found no reliable sources for this film and no proof that it was even released. The official website is dead and the YouTube trailer is set to private. Fails WP:NF. SL93 (talk) 19:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - a quick search for sources doesn't seem to turn up much, but given the title of the film, it may take some more digging. ~~The article might qualify for speedy deletion per CSD G11, however, because of its highly promotional nature.~~ Chris the Paleontologist (talk | contribs) 22:42, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- "Exclusively promotional"? Nope. Though through its lacking sources, we have other issues. We'll have to combine the various spellings and aka's of the film title with the name of the director... and hope for input from editors more able to find and read Cambodian sources. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 22:12, 3 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bryce (talk | contribs) 02:18, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've found another YouTube link for the trailer, and also two other films by the same director that have articles. Still no evidence that this film is notable though. 81.142.107.230 (talk) 10:39, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Salvio ^{Let's talk about it!} 15:22, 11 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.